Dr Joshua RaseraMineral Processing & Resource Systems
MINERAL PROCESSING / MINERAL ENRICHMENT

A difference
that separates.

Use differences in particle behaviour to enrich a mineral fraction.

My work connects material characterisation, tribocharger design and separator experiments with the choices needed for practical dry beneficiation.

Free-fall electrostatic separator used in the experimental investigation
The experimental separator. Rasera et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0.
01 / TRIBOCHARGING & ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATIONMODEL → DESIGN → EXPERIMENT

Contact.
Charge.
Separate.

The path a particle takes through a tribocharger changes the contacts it experiences. Those contacts influence the charge it acquires.

From a contact model to a physical separator

My PhD investigated tribocharging through modelling and experiments. In discrete element modelling, I examined particle contacts to inform tribocharger design, then evaluated an optimised design in a free-fall electrostatic separator.

What the experiments showed

Under terrestrial test conditions, pure silica and ilmenite acquired negative and positive charge respectively. The tribocharger changed their motion through the electric field. In JSC-1 simulant, increased density in some collectors indicated enrichment of denser constituents.

The useful result is the connection between charger design, particle charging and measurable separation behaviour, with performance evaluated for pure minerals, binary mixtures and a more complex simulant.

FROM THE PHD PAPERSTHE DESIGN & THE EXPERIMENT
Five helical baffle designs with pitches from 9 centimetres to 3 centimetres
Helical baffle geometries explored using DEM (Figure 5). Rasera et al. (2023), Powder Technology · CC BY 4.0. Reproduced without changes.
Free-fall separator with two electrodes above a multi-channel collector
The separator built for the experimental investigation (Figure 2). Rasera, Cilliers, Lamamy & Hadler (2023) · CC BY 4.0. Reproduced without changes.
THE PHD / CONTACT CHARGINGAN INTERACTIVE EXPLANATION

Contact charging.
Then free-fall separation.

Trace the connection between a tribocharger and a free-fall separator. Increase contact exposure to build charge, then change the electric field to see how that charge affects deflection. This conceptual applet uses silica-like and ilmenite-like particle classes.

TRIBOCHARGER → FREE-FALL SEPARATORCONCEPT DEMONSTRATOR
● Ilmenite-like (+)● Silica-like (−)Charging level: 0.91 / 1

More contact exposure increases charge towards a limit. Deflection depends on both charge and field strength.

What this explainsContacts influence charge acquisition. The field acts on charged particles, so changing charging conditions can change where material reports to a collector.

What my research investigatesHow contact history and tribocharger design influence charging, and how simulations can be tested against separator experiments.

Where the simplification stopsCharging follows an illustrative saturation curve, q* = 1 − exp(−4c), where c is contact exposure from 0 to 1. The coefficient, charge magnitudes and motion are not fitted to experimental data. Real feeds have distributions of charge, size and contact histories.

THE MEASURED EXPERIMENT

Compare the
collected material.

The paper compares collector distributions with and without the tribocharger. These photographs show the pure silica and pure ilmenite tests, rather than an applet output.

The charging and free-fall sequence above explains the idea. The published experiment establishes what happened in the tested apparatus and conditions.

Read the experimental paper ↗
Collector channels holding silica and ilmenite, comparing no charger and charger conditions
Collector comparison for pure silica and ilmenite (Figure 8). Rasera, Cilliers, Lamamy & Hadler (2023) · CC BY 4.0. Reproduced without changes. Click for the full figure.
03 / TERRESTRIAL DRY BENEFICIATIONMATERIAL → SEPARATION → FLOWSHEET

From the ore
to the flowsheet.

A substantial strand of my work concerns terrestrial dry mineral processing: connecting material properties to separation performance and practical process choices.

I work across characterisation, experimental investigation, performance analysis and flowsheet development. The questions extend beyond whether a separator works: what feed does it suit, how sensitive is it to conditions, and how does it fit into the whole process?

Start with the material

Particle size, mineral associations, texture and physical properties inform which separation mechanisms are plausible. I connect characterisation evidence with the design and interpretation of processing tests.

Compare the mechanisms

My experience spans evaluating dry separation options, including magnetic, electrostatic and density-based methods, and understanding their role alongside size classification and feed preparation.

Ask how dry is dry

Moisture and environmental conditions matter to dry processing. I investigate how material conditioning and changing feed properties influence behaviour, so that a technology is assessed in the conditions it needs to operate.

01 / EVIDENCE

Characterise & test

Connect material measurements with a focused experimental programme.

02 / PERFORMANCE

Diagnose the separation

Use mass balances, partition behaviour and grade-recovery relationships to examine what a process is doing.

03 / INTEGRATION

Build the flowsheet

Compare classification, separation, recirculation and blending scenarios as connected process choices.

04 / DECISIONS

Evaluate the trade-offs

Bring recovery, product quality, resource needs and economic assumptions into the same discussion.

The aim is to make better use of mineral resources while reducing reliance on water and understanding the wider consequences of a processing choice.

Discuss a dry-processing challenge ↗

Dust is part of the process, too

Related lunar work examines sustainable pre-filtration, electrostatic and cyclonic dust control, and dust hazards in habitats. Managing the fine fraction connects processing, material handling and the systems people must operate.

CONTINUE EXPLORING

How does particle size
change the behaviour?

Explore the research ↗